Judicial Management - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Welcome to our FAQ on Judicial Management in Singapore. This guide explains Judicial Management, a legal process under Singapore’s insolvency law. It’s for companies facing financial trouble but can potentially be saved.
In simple terms, Judicial Management allows a struggling company to get help from a court-appointed expert, called a Judicial Manager. This expert takes charge, trying to rescue the company, or at least, do the best for those owed money.
Our FAQ answers key questions about this process in Singapore, helping directors, creditors, and employees understand what happens, their rights, and what to expect.
Whether you’re involved in a company considering Judicial Management or just looking to learn, this guide offers easy-to-understand information about this important financial tool in Singapore.
General FAQ - Judicial Management
Judicial Management is a legally sanctioned process designed to assist financially distressed companies in restructuring their operations and finances under the supervision of the court. It aims to rehabilitate these companies while preserving their value.
Companies facing severe financial difficulties, insolvency, or the need for comprehensive restructuring to avoid liquidation should consider initiating the Judicial Management process.
The process is typically initiated through an application to the Singapore High Court, filed by the company’s directors, shareholders, or creditors.
A Judicial Manager is appointed by the court to oversee the company’s operations, assess its financial health, propose a restructuring plan, and manage the company’s affairs during the JM process.
The primary objectives of JM include rehabilitating and revitalizing financially distressed companies, preserving jobs, and maximizing value for creditors and shareholders.
Creditors and shareholders actively participate in the JM process, engaging in negotiations, voting on restructuring plans, and influencing the company’s future direction.
JM provides the company with an automatic moratorium on legal actions, offering temporary protection from creditor claims and legal proceedings.
Yes, if the company cannot successfully restructure and recover, the JM process may eventually lead to liquidation.
A Scheme of Arrangement is a structured plan outlining how the company intends to repay its debts and reorganize its operations. It requires approval from both creditors and shareholders.
The duration of JM varies depending on the complexity of the case and can span several months.
Costs related to JM, including fees for the Judicial Manager and legal expenses, are usually borne by the company.
Yes, companies and stakeholders have the right to seek independent legal advice to ensure their interests are safeguarded throughout the JM process.
Successful restructuring efforts can lead to the company exiting the JM process, with the restructuring plan implemented.
In cases where recovery and successful restructuring prove unattainable, the JM process may be terminated, potentially resulting in liquidation.
FAQs for Directors
Directors should contemplate JM when their company faces severe financial challenges, insolvency, or requires comprehensive restructuring to avoid liquidation.
During JM, directors may continue to manage the company’s day-to-day operations under the guidance and supervision of the appointed Judicial Manager (JM). Their cooperation with the JM is crucial.
Yes, directors have the right to seek independent legal advice to understand their roles, responsibilities, and obligations throughout the JM process.
When a JM is appointed, they assume control of the company’s management and operations. Directors are expected to collaborate with the JM to execute the restructuring plan effectively.
Directors should work towards achieving successful rehabilitation for the company, job preservation, and maximizing value for creditors and shareholders.
Generally, directors do not incur personal liability for the company’s debts during JM. However, they must act in the best interests of creditors and shareholders.
Directors can provide input and cooperate with the JM in developing the restructuring plan. However, the final plan is subject to approval by creditors and shareholders.
If the company successfully restructures and improves its financial health, it may exit the JM process, and the restructuring plan will be implemented.
Directors should maintain transparent communication with creditors and shareholders, keeping them informed of developments and the progress of the restructuring plan.
Directors may be required to attend JM-related meetings and court proceedings as necessary to fulfill their responsibilities during the process.
Directors continue to manage the company’s operations as usual after successfully exiting JM, subject to any changes outlined in the restructuring plan.
FAQs for Shareholders
JM may influence shareholders’ interests by potentially affecting the value of their shares and their role in the company’s restructuring.
While shareholders can express their concerns or support for JM, formal initiation typically requires an application to the Singapore High Court by directors, shareholders, or creditors.
Shareholders do not directly appoint the Judicial Manager. The court makes this appointment based on the application and the company’s financial situation.
Yes, shareholders have the right to seek independent legal counsel to understand the implications of JM on their rights and interests.
Upon the appointment of a JM, they assume control of the company’s management and operations. Shareholders’ influence may be limited during this period.
Shareholders have the opportunity to vote on the proposed restructuring plan, but the plan’s formulation and details are typically handled by the Judicial Manager and company management.
Shareholders should aim to maximize the value of their investment while recognizing that JM primarily seeks to rehabilitate the company and protect creditor interests.
Shareholders generally do not face personal liability for the company’s debts during JM. Their financial exposure is typically limited to their shareholdings.
Rejection of the restructuring plan by shareholders may lead to alternative outcomes, including potential liquidation, as determined by the court.
The duration of JM varies based on case complexity but can extend over several months.
After successfully exiting JM, shareholders continue to hold shares in the restructured company and may benefit from its recovery.
While not mandatory, shareholders may choose to attend JM-related meetings, particularly those related to voting on the restructuring plan.
If the company successfully restructures, shareholders’ equity may be preserved, and they will continue to hold shares in the restructured entity.
Shareholders with disagreements regarding JM outcomes can seek legal advice and explore legal options if they believe their rights have been violated.
FAQs for Creditors
JM can impact creditors’ rights by potentially influencing the repayment of debts and the terms of the restructuring plan, which may affect their claims.
Creditors have the option to apply to the Singapore High Court for the initiation of JM if they believe it is necessary to protect their interests and recover outstanding debts.
Creditors, especially major ones, may participate in the appointment of the Judicial Manager during the JM process, which can influence the management of the company’s affairs.
Absolutely, creditors have the right to seek independent legal counsel to understand how JM may impact their claims, rights, and potential recovery.
The JM process may lead to a restructuring plan that outlines how creditors will be repaid. The terms and conditions vary, but creditors’ claims are typically addressed within this plan.
Creditors often have the opportunity to vote on the proposed restructuring plan. Their input and agreement can be crucial in the approval of the plan.
Creditors aim to maximize the recovery of their outstanding debts while understanding that JM primarily seeks to rehabilitate the company and protect the interests of all stakeholders.
Once JM is initiated, an automatic moratorium on legal actions against the company is usually in effect, providing temporary protection to the company from creditor claims.
Rejection of the restructuring plan by creditors may lead to alternative outcomes, such as liquidation, determined by the court.
The duration of JM can vary widely, contingent on the complexity of the case, but it often spans several months.
If the company successfully restructures, creditors may receive repayment in accordance with the terms outlined in the restructuring plan.
While attendance at JM-related meetings or court proceedings is not mandatory for all creditors, it may be advisable depending on the circumstances.
Creditors with disagreements about JM outcomes or claim treatment can seek legal advice and explore legal options to protect their interests.
If the company cannot successfully restructure, creditors may receive payment according to the terms outlined in the JM process, which may include potential liquidation.
Any Queries? Contact Us.
Guardian Advisory - Company Liquidation Singapore
Your trusted partner in restructuring and liquidation services in Singapore. We provide restructuring advisory services and are approved liquidators in Singapore.